helicopter Videos
Watching: Wildcat aw159 helicopter first flight
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Mann Friday - Atmosphere Posted by: t43562
Video duration: 221 seconds Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Helicopter videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: t43562. on 26 Jun 11, 19:41:36
I think that the Wildcat? is not the same as this Mk9A- the airframe is new (apparently less parts) and although the Mk9A has the same engines, I think it's avionics appear to not be new apart from the communications system. I don't know how much difference all of that makes.
By: stratagie1. on 23 Jun 11, 22:09:59
Well the Chinook is in it's own class i am talking? about the fact the Americans have the black hawk and the British have the Merlin to do the same job
By: stratagie1. on 19 Jun 11, 16:58:07
We have the? merlin instead
By: kingdavewoody. on 25 Mar 11, 01:05:22
Also, thats 7 seats of troops with no gear, I belive it works out to be 4 seats if they're wearing webbing, patrol packs, ECM, weapons etc. Westland don't have to make decent aircraft because they know that any piece of crap they make, the MOD will still buy. I'm working on the MK9A in? California at the moment, and deploying to Afghanistan with is shortly, and it's an awful aircraft.
By: drfan2004. on 15 Mar 11, 22:00:27
A beautiful Lynx respun-albeit less than ideal for the Army's purposes in Afghanistan.A lighter smaller version of the Chinook like the 1950's era Belvedere being capable of carrying a section of men,their equipment and slung load; respun would? have been a better and cheaper solution,for the army/marines anyway. They just dont design them with the practical thinking as they once did.
By: Atricz. on 04 Feb 11, 21:02:44
why? didnt they buy the blackhawk for 500m less
By: TheMitchy93. on 23 Dec 10, 15:07:21
@t43562,No problem, easy mistake. The Blackhawk isn't too much, I though am not that bothered what helicopter we get, I think the Royal Navy like this helicopter though because its predessors have been proven in battle and it's smaller for? when it lands on our smaller naval ships.
By: t43562. on 23 Dec 10, 14:56:45
Thanks for the correction and sorry for making that mistake. OK. I have read that the Apache is not a simple helicopter and it isn't tiny so surely the Blackhawk is not too? much?
By: TheMitchy93. on 22 Dec 10, 13:38:58
@t43562, The RAF fly Chinooks? not the Army.
By: t43562. on 03 Dec 10, 09:58:27
the? army fly the Chinook and that's pretty big.
By: KurtG85. on 03 Dec 10, 08:40:35
What were those political reasons sir??
By: Elitepoosniff. on 19 Oct 10, 01:30:38
Why the fuck dont they make a version called the nemesis, put a 30mm chain gun like on the Apache than put Rockets like the Hell Fire and other Rockets like the Apache, this can be fitted with the same system as the Apache, this helicopter would then be better? than the Apache because this is faster.
By: shorerydr10. on 05 May 10, 04:30:49
OMG this is? so cool. I like thenice quality of the video and sound too...
By: SheepJumpFish. on 27 Nov 09, 21:49:46
that is bloody beautiful, I accidentally rated 4 stars, sorry about that?