helicopter Videos
Watching: V 22 ospray formidable aircraft
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
La LEYENDA del Halcónplateado continua -apoyo traslado organo a nivel Intermunicipal- Posted by: aeropolicialmexico
Video duration: 102 seconds Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Helicopter videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: sl600rt. on 21 May 12, 08:55:45
the MV-22 is a bucket of compromises. it can't auto-rotate, it can't glide, it can't hover over 4,000 feet, it can't land safely above 4,000 feet unless you have a? runway, it's prop/rotor hybrid blades are inefficient for both hover and flight, its unarmed, it needs several conventional helicopters to fly escort, it's a big fat christmas goose of a target when trying to land or take off, it was forced into marine service after all the other services turned it down.
By: Blueberry954. on 26 Apr 12, 21:42:25
u? speld osprey wrong
By: adrian183. on 04 Feb 12, 00:02:15
Glad you know? how to spell Osprey
By: salakast. on 21 Jan 12, 22:08:00
GTFO ITS? ALL ABOUT SUPER MARIO *sarcasm*
By: Sonofsweetness. on 09 Jan 12, 13:38:26
Halo? reach got their design for the falcon from the osprey, didn't they? Oh well back to MW3
By: TheLigitGamerrrrr. on 08 Dec 11, 00:20:22
GTFO? its all about BF3!!
By: Schizy01. on 30 Nov 11, 02:36:59
Ospray=Marine killer!!! Gearbox failure? and it drops like a rock.
By: Schizy01. on 30 Nov 11, 02:35:06
Ospray=Marine? killer!!!
By: 01mustanger. on 29 Nov 11, 09:21:03
BIRD INBOUND!!?
By: markjos11. on 26 Nov 11, 23:32:30
@aeropolicialmexico the V-22 Osprey isnt a hellicopter, its a tilt wing/rotor VTOL/STOVL aircraft. also in regards to the end of the video, the ospray isnt likely to be used? in actual operations any time soon due to problems and contreversy. just thought you should know! :)
By: poulsontheprick. on 19 Nov 11, 22:56:08
Looks? a bit cumbersome to me.
By: catastrovision. on 17 Nov 11, 08:11:02
the virginity? is strong on your comment.
By: MrEpicChancho. on 14 Nov 11, 01:06:41
MW3? BITCHES :D
By: davek71. on 14 Sep 11, 22:56:21
@762SLR762 If your calling him a door knob then maybe, but if you? mean nob in reference to a penis then you will find it's nob.
By: davek71. on 14 Sep 11, 11:50:57
@762SLR762 That will be nob not knob.? Pleb
By: usmc1stin1. on 07 Sep 11, 23:18:10
it gets wounded out at 250 knots if not faster if need be, so its saving? more lives
By: usmc1stin1. on 07 Sep 11, 23:16:55
continued... the technology to keep those birds flyable and stable for long periods of time did not exist quite yet. there is just to much that has to be shoved through a ppilots head in order to attempt to fly a vtol in helicopter mode safely. now, why we requested such an aircraft is? easy.
By: usmc1stin1. on 07 Sep 11, 23:16:18
hey, i am a v-22 airframer for the corps, i think i can answer? alot of those questons as non-condescending as possible, as i dont mean them to be. first, yes there actually have been vtols in the making since the 50's even, but they were all prototypes and most model if not all, had many flaws and were decommissioned after a couple hundred flight hours of use.
By: TheTerraVoltage. on 05 Sep 11, 04:08:20
looks badass?
By: UberTroll13. on 03 Sep 11, 14:01:13
such a waste? of money
By: BlazorZazor. on 30 Aug 11, 23:11:10
A helicohpters engiene is as big as a? backpack they say. :\
By: Tjita1. on 23 Aug 11, 20:48:16
Continuation: I also don't get the reference to helicopters. A helicopters speed is basically limited due to the fact that half of the blades travels backwards, which mean that they, given enough forward speed of the aircraft, actually stands still or? even moves in reverse through the airstream, thus not producing any lift. I don't get how that translates to a ducted fan tiltrotor aircraft with it's fans in horizontal mode. Please explain, I might be missing something here.
By: Tjita1. on 23 Aug 11, 20:43:26
I like the text in the description. I? can't for my life understand why a boundary layer around the ducts would limit forward speed though. I mean, the turbofan on a commercial airliner is basically a ducted fan, albeit it get's some propulsion from the jet exhaust as well, but the majority in modern engines come from the fan. Which is in a duct. And those do like 900 km/h if you want them to. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying: Why?
By: okoskutya35. on 09 Aug 11, 16:54:57
WERRY DANGERAUS MACHINE?
By: BUCEnGAR. on 11 Jul 11, 03:40:38
I'm not really sure why we reinvented the wheel with the V-22. We had this technology completely functioning and workable in 1965 in the LTV XC-142, and also in the Canadair CL-84. Of course back then, the military didn't foresee an urgent need for a VTOL that? had an extended combat radius. So here we are 40 years later reinventing the wheel at the cost of billions of taxpayer dollars. I mean, why use something we've already developed when you could start from scratch and charge more.